IB Economics Paper 1 essays are where many students lose marks despite knowing the theory well — the difference between a 5 and a 7 often comes down to structure and evaluation, not content knowledge. Here's how to approach it.
The Core Structure
- Define key terms — briefly and precisely define the economic terms central to the question
- Develop your argument — use economic theory, supported by an accurately drawn and labelled diagram, to explain the mechanism being asked about
- Apply real-world context — reference a specific real or plausible example to ground the theory
- Evaluate — critically assess the argument's limitations, considering alternative perspectives or conditions
- Conclude — a substantiated judgement that directly answers the question, not just a summary
What "Evaluation" Actually Means
This is where most students lose marks. Evaluation is not simply listing more points — it's critically examining the strength or limitations of an argument. Strong evaluation often considers:
- Short-run vs long-run effects
- Different stakeholder perspectives (consumers, producers, government)
- Conditions under which the theory might not hold in practice
- Magnitude — is the effect likely to be large or small in this specific context?
Diagram Technique
Diagrams must be accurately drawn, fully labelled (axes, curves, equilibrium points), and explicitly referenced in your written explanation. A diagram included but not discussed in the text earns minimal credit — always explain what the diagram shows in your own words.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Pure description without evaluation — explaining theory accurately but never critically assessing it
- Generic real-world examples — vague references without specific, relevant detail
- Diagrams that don't match the argument — using a standard diagram without adapting it to the specific question
- Weak conclusions — simply restating the question rather than reaching a substantiated judgement